Knowledge Management

Question:
Hi All,
Can we have the same wage type XXXX in Infotype 14 and as well as 15 ..? If so how does it effect Payroll ..?
Becuase the same wage type can be a recurring sometimes and sometimes it will be an additional payement..
Thanks for your time.!
_________________
Nandhini !
"He who asks , is a fool for five minutes, but he who does not ask remains a fool forever."
Answer:
Hi, yes you can - no impact on payroll.
_________________
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The light that burns twice as bright burns half as long.
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like bananas.
info@brooklands-hr.co.uk

Answer:
but it can cause problems with factoring!
If you set it to factor and its loaded on IT0015 what will happen?
Usually need some jiggery-pokery to make sure it doesnt do anything odd!
Good luck
Greg
_________________
www.newhithr.co.uk

Answer:
Taking the GB schema (from memory)
IT0014 is called in subschema GT00
IT0015 is called in subschema GAP0
Factoring starts happening AFTER this in subschema GAL0
So I'm not sure where the problem comes in with factoring when the WT is in both IT14 & 15?
Chief
_________________
Happiness is like peeing in your pants. Everyone else can see it but only you can feel the warmth!
Answer:
Hi bigchief and muhnkee_2 ,
Thanks for the response .
CAn we save the same wage type is 14 and 15 simultaneously i mean for one pay period ......?
_________________
Nandhini !
"He who asks , is a fool for five minutes, but he who does not ask remains a fool forever."
Answer:
yep
lots of people do that to adjust a recurring payment for just one period
good luck
greg
_________________
www.newhithr.co.uk

Answer:
as Greg states - set a IT15 wage type to factor and it will bomb out in the schema (sorry BC - cant remember quite where)
either have different wage types in 14/15 if the 14 wage type needs to prorate based on start/end date - or have just a 14 wage type that you then need to change the amount on for a certain period.
Answer:
as Greg states - set a IT15 wage type to factor and it will bomb out in the schema (sorry BC - cant remember quite where)
either have different wage types in 14/15 if the 14 wage type needs to prorate based on start/end date - or have just a 14 wage type that you then need to change the amount on for a certain period.
T-Man & Greg - I'd love to know where the system bombs out when you do this as from memory, I've never had this problem. Unfortunately moi does not have access to a system - "in between contracts" as you know
_________________
Happiness is like peeing in your pants. Everyone else can see it but only you can feel the warmth!
Answer:
I'd love to know where the system bombs out when you do this as from memory, I've never had this problem.
I agree with bigchief
P0014 & P0015 import the infotype vals to RT and there's no indicator of the "origin" of the entry so how could PPF reject if a WT originated from 0015 and was setup for PPF. The only place to do this sort of check would be a rule used by FU P0015 to reject if PRCL10 but thats not part of the std rule (nor should it be as it would be nothing more than a check against bad config!)
Summary
If the wagetype's to be factored (PRCL10) it only belongs on 0008/0014 and must never be on 0015/2010 etc.
_________________
1. The quality of answers displays a direct relationship to the quality of the questions.
2. The chance of you getting answers to new posts is dramatically enhanced if you respond positively when you get a proposed answer.